Greengoroy wrote:Does anyone think tomorrow is going to be the day??
The odds become increasingly greater as time progresses.
Greengoroy wrote:Does anyone think tomorrow is going to be the day??
Nope.Greengoroy wrote:Does anyone think tomorrow is going to be the day??
I second that.2012_UMD wrote:Nope.Greengoroy wrote:Does anyone think tomorrow is going to be the day??
Or for those of us who go to school in the south, tomorrow is the last day of finals... so yeah, summer it is!secondThat wrote:I second that.2012_UMD wrote:Nope.Greengoroy wrote:Does anyone think tomorrow is going to be the day??
It's too early for them. I bet that they won't tell us the results until summer (after school ends). It's only a month away, for us quarter system people. And for semester system people, it's even sooner... sigh~~~
"If I stay at this blackjack table a little longer, my luck will change!" ;)Guest111111 wrote:The odds become increasingly greater as time progresses.
That's exactly the problem though, SMART doesn't have anything to do with it. They need to get the money from their funding organization, the DoD. Their hands are tied as well.smart_hopeful wrote:Guest111111 wrote:I'm fortunate enough not to be in that position, but at least SMART knows they're going to start hemorrhaging some people if they don't get their act together soon.
I'm not sure why we keep getting reminded that the SMART office proper is waiting on the DoD. My frustration is with the entire process, regardless of who is to blame. The point is the ire, and "SMART" (in my mind) includes all parties involved especially the bad person holding this up.Aaarrghh wrote:That's exactly the problem though, SMART doesn't have anything to do with it. They need to get the money from their funding organization, the DoD. Their hands are tied as well.smart_hopeful wrote:Guest111111 wrote:I'm fortunate enough not to be in that position, but at least SMART knows they're going to start hemorrhaging some people if they don't get their act together soon.
I agree. As a technical matter the distinction is a little spurious anyway - SMART is a DoD program. "Waiting on SMART" and "waiting on DoD" are pretty much synonymous from an org chart standpoint. It is of course also true that ASEE runs SMART and the delay isn't ASEE's fault. This would be an important distinction if we were going to egg the guilty organization's building, so so far I don't think we've gone that nuts yet.SMARTless wrote:I'm not sure why we keep getting reminded that the SMART office proper is waiting on the DoD. My frustration is with the entire process, regardless of who is to blame. The point is the ire, and "SMART" (in my mind) includes all parties involved especially the bad person holding this up.
I second that motion.LostInTheSauce wrote:I could be tempted to slap some bologna slices on their black SUV's. Just sayin'...
I guess as someone who already works for the DoD, I see it as a necessary clarification. Not that it really matters why the scholarships are held up (I'm as frustrated as the next person), but the point is that from an "org chart standpoint" SMART and DoD are NOT synonymous. That's the problem. When the funding agency gets the money and when all the programs get their cut of the pie are two entirely different things, and it's impacting all of DoD, not just the SMART program. Either way, you are correct in that it is just arguing semantics, we're waiting for DoD, but as someone who deals with this as part of their every day job I see the distinction very clearly.smart_hopeful wrote:I agree. As a technical matter the distinction is a little spurious anyway - SMART is a DoD program. "Waiting on SMART" and "waiting on DoD" are pretty much synonymous from an org chart standpoint. It is of course also true that ASEE runs SMART and the delay isn't ASEE's fault. This would be an important distinction if we were going to egg the guilty organization's building, so so far I don't think we've gone that nuts yet.SMARTless wrote:I'm not sure why we keep getting reminded that the SMART office proper is waiting on the DoD. My frustration is with the entire process, regardless of who is to blame. The point is the ire, and "SMART" (in my mind) includes all parties involved especially the bad person holding this up.
Correction: The NDSEG rejection letters just went out. The announcements have been going out for the past two three weeks.NDSEG wrote:NDSEG anouncements went out
Even though I knew that my NDSEG rejection letter is on the way to my mailbox, actually seeing it is more heartbreaking... It's going to be the same for the SMART. I know my rejection is coming, but I'll still cry when I get it... sadness....2012_UMD wrote:Correction: The NDSEG rejection letters just went out. The announcements have been going out for the past two three weeks.NDSEG wrote:NDSEG anouncements went out
well in that case, there's always a chance they just won't tell us. They could just do the "slow fade" and stop responding to all communications.sighhhh wrote:Even though I knew that my NDSEG rejection letter is on the way to my mailbox, actually seeing it is more heartbreaking... It's going to be the same for the SMART. I know my rejection is coming, but I'll still cry when I get it... sadness....2012_UMD wrote:Correction: The NDSEG rejection letters just went out. The announcements have been going out for the past two three weeks.NDSEG wrote:NDSEG anouncements went out
That's extremely doubtful. Detailed published DoD budget figures are available online (I linked them a few pages back), and while SMART's parent agency has a reduced budget, the reduction is nowhere near absolute brokeness.Batumi wrote:I think they have probably lost all their funding. I mean, first trying to shirk their responsibilities toward prior year awardees, then delaying the announcements... All signs point to absolute brokeness. Today is the day I stop checking this forum and stop paying any attention whatsoever to the scholarship.
I'm going to agree with you, partly because I just don't want the alternative to be true. But, even though it's possible that the DOD tanks the whole program, I severely doubt it. It'd makemore sense to tank the NDSEG program since SMART recruits employees. Likely, this year's and future awards will look different than what we applied for or they'll reduce the number of awards, but not outright cancellation.smart_hopeful wrote:That's extremely doubtful. Detailed published DoD budget figures are available online (I linked them a few pages back), and while SMART's parent agency has a reduced budget, the reduction is nowhere near absolute brokeness.Batumi wrote:I think they have probably lost all their funding. I mean, first trying to shirk their responsibilities toward prior year awardees, then delaying the announcements... All signs point to absolute brokeness. Today is the day I stop checking this forum and stop paying any attention whatsoever to the scholarship.
I don't know about "the" day but it will be "a" day.Greengoroy wrote:Does anyone think tomorrow is going to be the day??
I would argue the opposite - precisely because SMART recruits employees, it's a bigger liability. The onus is not only on the scholarship office to provide funding, but also the sponsoring lab or office for a few years once you're done with school. Given current staff hiring freezes and downsizing, I can't imagine that's an easy commitment to make, especially when everything in DC is so driven by the fiscal year schedule and "until next year" mentality, which makes it more difficult to do longer-range planning.2012_UMD wrote:I'm going to agree with you, partly because I just don't want the alternative to be true. But, even though it's possible that the DOD tanks the whole program, I severely doubt it. It'd makemore sense to tank the NDSEG program since SMART recruits employees. Likely, this year's and future awards will look different than what we applied for or they'll reduce the number of awards, but not outright cancellation.
You'll find both attitudes amongst the SMART program employees and SFs. That's why you see some weird hiring mechanisms mentioned over on the Recipients forum, and why SMART scholars are often less than pleased with the options extended to them during this time of a hiring freeze.smart_hopeful wrote:As far as I understand the program, the obligation is more "awardees are required to follow DoD instructions after graduation" than "DoD is required to hire awardees"