by annoyedSMARTIE » Sun Jun 02, 2013 11:46 am
I received tentative and final job offer letters from my SF that stated that they would be hiring me on as a career conditional employee starting this monday (tomorrow) over the past couple weeks. On Friday at 3pm, I received an email saying that they needed to modify my letter to change me to a excepted service position and that they could convert me to a career conditional after 3 years. After doing some research on the difference, I found out that this means that I can not apply for in house jobs without going through the OPM hiring process and, therefore, as long as there is a hiring freeze, I cannot apply for any of those positions. I had discussed my starting level with my supervisor previously, and we agreed that I would not try to negotiate for a higher positions because she expects that there will be some openings in our group over the next couple years that I would have a high chance of getting. They are bringing me in as a GS-11 Step 1 (as a PhD), because the hiring freeze would not allow them to create a position and the only position they had was a GS-7/9/11 position. When I read documents about the hiring authority they are using for SMART recipients, it states that they do not have to hire under Title 5 (Title 5 is the document that controls GS pay scales, etc.) and that we are allowed to be hired despite the hiring freeze due to "critical need." I believe that this means that the SFs can hire us at any position that they want and that they can even create a position since we are critical need and do not need to follow Title 5. Has anyone had any experience with this??
I received tentative and final job offer letters from my SF that stated that they would be hiring me on as a career conditional employee starting this monday (tomorrow) over the past couple weeks. On Friday at 3pm, I received an email saying that they needed to modify my letter to change me to a excepted service position and that they could convert me to a career conditional after 3 years. After doing some research on the difference, I found out that this means that I can not apply for in house jobs without going through the OPM hiring process and, therefore, as long as there is a hiring freeze, I cannot apply for any of those positions. I had discussed my starting level with my supervisor previously, and we agreed that I would not try to negotiate for a higher positions because she expects that there will be some openings in our group over the next couple years that I would have a high chance of getting. They are bringing me in as a GS-11 Step 1 (as a PhD), because the hiring freeze would not allow them to create a position and the only position they had was a GS-7/9/11 position. When I read documents about the hiring authority they are using for SMART recipients, it states that they do not have to hire under Title 5 (Title 5 is the document that controls GS pay scales, etc.) and that we are allowed to be hired despite the hiring freeze due to "critical need." I believe that this means that the SFs can hire us at any position that they want and that they can even create a position since we are critical need and do not need to follow Title 5. Has anyone had any experience with this??