by CMMMM » Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:17 am
Ms. Wright was most unhelpful during my facility change process. If/when she finally responded to email, she was condescending and quite useless when it came to assisting with my new placement. I had to find a new facility on my own through networking and spamming. And even after I found a place, she never actually talked to me directly about it- everything went through the mentor at the new SF.
One reason the SMART program will continue to kick the payback can down the road is that they know once a policy is in place, scholars will leave, and that will hurt their "retention rate." Before Larry left the forum to sulk, he claimed an 80% retention rate, but couldn't/wouldn't give specifics on how it was calculated. An artificially high, vaguely defined retention rate is necessary so that all involved with SMART can keep patting themselves on the back. (Just look at some of the archived articles on sites like army.mil, lol.)
Ms. Wright was most unhelpful during my facility change process. If/when she finally responded to email, she was condescending and quite useless when it came to assisting with my new placement. I had to find a new facility on my own through networking and spamming. And even after I found a place, she never actually talked to me directly about it- everything went through the mentor at the new SF.
One reason the SMART program will continue to kick the payback can down the road is that they know once a policy is in place, scholars will leave, and that will hurt their "retention rate." Before Larry left the forum to sulk, he claimed an 80% retention rate, but couldn't/wouldn't give specifics on how it was calculated. An artificially high, vaguely defined retention rate is necessary so that all involved with SMART can keep patting themselves on the back. (Just look at some of the archived articles on sites like army.mil, lol.)