by Sisyphus » Wed May 13, 2020 6:02 pm
If you're in a PhD I'd be vary wary of accepting this award (you can search my post history as to how I speak from experience).
SMART will IN NO WAY help you actually finish your PhD. It will in fact actively hinder your due to the internship requirements. They don't help you with funding. You are already several years in so your SF isn't going to help you with your research topic (99.5% likelihood). You will simply be not as poor during your degree as if you were RA/TAing.
In exchange, you are risking (because PhDs take a long ass time) many years at your SF where there are good odds you won't actually be doing "real" PhD grade research. Your skills will atrophy and after a few years good luck getting a job elsewhere.
Also, for a STEM PhD your GS11 salary will be shit compared to what you can get elsewhere, even in just the private defense industry. I'm making 25-30k more annually now than had SMART not stabbed me in the back.
Lastly, if things go wrong with your PhD (and believe me, as bad as you THINK they can go...they can go worse...) SMART WILL NOT UNDERSTAND, they are basically ignorant illiterates when it comes to the nature of a PhD and what it entails, and operate under the assumption that it's as deterministic as a BS or MS (they say they don't, but words and text are worthless when actions speak for themselves).
While your specific circumstances/SF/PhD progress/etc. might make it a not terrible choice, I literally cannot recommend ANYONE go into SMART as a PhD. Too many things can go wrong and the SPO does NOT have your best interests at heart. You are a credentialed serf to them.
If you're in a PhD I'd be vary wary of accepting this award (you can search my post history as to how I speak from experience).
SMART will IN NO WAY help you actually finish your PhD. It will in fact actively hinder your due to the internship requirements. They don't help you with funding. You are already several years in so your SF isn't going to help you with your research topic (99.5% likelihood). You will simply be not as poor during your degree as if you were RA/TAing.
In exchange, you are risking (because PhDs take a long ass time) many years at your SF where there are good odds you won't actually be doing "real" PhD grade research. Your skills will atrophy and after a few years good luck getting a job elsewhere.
Also, for a STEM PhD your GS11 salary will be shit compared to what you can get elsewhere, even in just the private defense industry. I'm making 25-30k more annually now than had SMART not stabbed me in the back.
Lastly, if things go wrong with your PhD (and believe me, as bad as you THINK they can go...they can go worse...) SMART [b][i][u]WILL NOT UNDERSTAND[/u][/i][/b], they are basically ignorant illiterates when it comes to the nature of a PhD and what it entails, and operate under the assumption that it's as deterministic as a BS or MS (they say they don't, but words and text are worthless when actions speak for themselves).
While your specific circumstances/SF/PhD progress/etc. might make it a not terrible choice, I literally cannot recommend ANYONE go into SMART as a PhD. Too many things can go wrong and the SPO does NOT have your best interests at heart. You are a credentialed serf to them.