by Guest » Wed Apr 05, 2017 2:44 pm
Im not so sure... if the program has grown maybe they are trying to speed up the process, and in my opinion l, cutting one of the two interviews would be the easiest way to do so. If one candidate was recommended by multiple facilities then they can refer to the application for facility and geographic preference, or send the candidate to whichever facility has the most need for that skillset. Additionally, it has been five months, and according to another poster, they recently said results would be announced in early April. I would be a little concerned about working for an organization that does not adhere to their own deadlines without further communication from them (meaning a quick hey, were running behind but are working as quickly as possible) and I'll bet they are aware of that as well. Who knows though, there seems to be so much uncertainty in the defense industry right now, so maybe theyre playing it safe and waiting just a little longer to see what happens in the world.
Im not so sure... if the program has grown maybe they are trying to speed up the process, and in my opinion l, cutting one of the two interviews would be the easiest way to do so. If one candidate was recommended by multiple facilities then they can refer to the application for facility and geographic preference, or send the candidate to whichever facility has the most need for that skillset. Additionally, it has been five months, and according to another poster, they recently said results would be announced in early April. I would be a little concerned about working for an organization that does not adhere to their own deadlines without further communication from them (meaning a quick hey, were running behind but are working as quickly as possible) and I'll bet they are aware of that as well. Who knows though, there seems to be so much uncertainty in the defense industry right now, so maybe theyre playing it safe and waiting just a little longer to see what happens in the world.