by Guest01 » Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:10 am
There's a lot of things that need to be addressed here. I'm going to do my best to answer them. As you know, you can view experiences of other recipients in the other forum on this site.
This is the first time I've put in for the scholarship and couldn't help but notice the negative attitude people seem to have for this program. Is this a case of people not researching the SF and asking the right questions (such as pay advancement, job description) before signing a legally binding contract or a bait and switch?
To answer this question simply, the SF I was selected for did a major bait and switch. I know if you ask the other scholars that were at my SF, they would give you the same response. Back when I was notified of acceptance, I was hesitant, called the point of contact numerous times, and even spoke in person. It sounded challenging and relevant to my degree. Pay and compensation was also discussed and provided. They wouldn't (and claimed they couldn't) sign anything to "lock in" any terms or conditions, but we were assured repeatedly that this was the way it was going to be - and that all new hires were treated this way. I talked to previous hires from previous years, and they indicated that the terms they outlined were indeed what they were offered. Feeling somewhat assured, I took the risk, and signed the SMART contract.
Midway through a school year, all "scholars" from this particular SF received an email stating that effective immediately, all new hires would be subject to different terms. They told us point blank that this was because they felt that the "SMART scholarship was generous enough" and that there was no negotiation. As you may or may not know, the contract that you sign with SMART does not cover any employment or compensation terms. In this situation, we were completely hosed.
Make matters worse, the job description described to us was, in my opinion, downright deceptive. Most weeks were filled with literally nothing to do - and those times that I was assigned something, it was always paperwork,
completely irrelevant to an undergraduate and graduate engineering degree. I really, really, REALLY cannot stress enough how little I was given, and how irrelevant my job responsibilities were to my skillset. I did not see a single soul work the job description described to me, and feel very strongly that it did not (and currently does not) exist.
Wow, I am amazed that this program exists. I received my award letter, filled out my forms and waited for the money. Incredibly, on the third Friday in August I received a direct deposit of $4,950 into my bank account ($2,750 monthly stipend, $1,200 for insurance and $1,000 for books). Each and every third Friday of the month, I receive another $2,750. What have I had to do? At the end of the semester I had to send them an official transcript, that's it - a $12 transcript.. I haven't done any of the internships yet and have not had to go through the hiring process, but that will happen soon enough. Every time I have a question, I send an email to the point of contact and my questions are answered promptly. The freedom and reduction in the pressure of providing for may family has been tremendous.
I find humor in the posts that say "don't bother with SMART, it is a waste of time and effort, just go directly to the private market". I will pocket $35,200 per year (maybe even more once I complete the MS degree en route to the PhD) plus tuition and fees, for the next three years,. I have a paid internship that will give me a preview of my job for the next two summers. I also have the possibility of a job after graduation (if it doesn't work out, oh-well).
Back when I found out that SMART existed, I was amazed, excited even. Work hard in school, get recruited along with others that are described as the "best and the brightest," provided a stipend, and a job after graduation. Everything was supposed to be taken care of - I thought of it as an opportunity to rid myself of all of the stresses outside of my studies themselves. It was great and life couldn't be better.
However, in light of my experience (and the many others that are described on this forum), I would caution all applicants to think outside of the immediate financial rewards of this program. In particular, I'd really try to find out from other scholars (and even other employees) at the SF what exactly they do day-to-day. If it's what you were dreaming of, great! However, if it's not, think long and hard about accepting. If for example R&D is your dream job, be damn sure they are researching, designing, prototyping, and doing the legwork that you expect yourself to be doing. Don't settle for the paper-pusher that hands out contracts to the R&D contractors, even if you can reason to yourself that you can do it for the term of your scholarship service commitment. While that may be true, come finding-another-employment-opportunity time, you will find it will be quite difficult to explain to your prospective employers during interviews how you're going to bring anything to the table. They're hiring you on the expectation that you have experience, you know what youre doing. If you're rusty on skills, and have nothing on your resume other than paperpusher, you're not giving them a good reason to hire you over the recent graduate or another person who is fresh on those skills. By the way, most research / development / design groups will give you a technical interview. It's hard to BS your way out of those....
My point being - do not get caught in that trap! The financial rewards of SMART may be great initially, but you may pay dearly for it career wise. Consider carefully, and accept only after you are nothing less than 100% sure that you'll be satisfied.
There's a lot of things that need to be addressed here. I'm going to do my best to answer them. As you know, you can view experiences of other recipients in the other forum on this site.
[quote]
This is the first time I've put in for the scholarship and couldn't help but notice the negative attitude people seem to have for this program. Is this a case of people not researching the SF and asking the right questions (such as pay advancement, job description) before signing a legally binding contract or a bait and switch?
[/quote]
To answer this question simply, the SF I was selected for did a major bait and switch. I know if you ask the other scholars that were at my SF, they would give you the same response. Back when I was notified of acceptance, I was hesitant, called the point of contact numerous times, and even spoke in person. It sounded challenging and relevant to my degree. Pay and compensation was also discussed and provided. They wouldn't (and claimed they couldn't) sign anything to "lock in" any terms or conditions, but we were assured repeatedly that this was the way it was going to be - and that all new hires were treated this way. I talked to previous hires from previous years, and they indicated that the terms they outlined were indeed what they were offered. Feeling somewhat assured, I took the risk, and signed the SMART contract.
Midway through a school year, all "scholars" from this particular SF received an email stating that effective immediately, all new hires would be subject to different terms. They told us point blank that this was because they felt that the "SMART scholarship was generous enough" and that there was no negotiation. As you may or may not know, the contract that you sign with SMART does not cover any employment or compensation terms. In this situation, we were completely hosed.
Make matters worse, the job description described to us was, in my opinion, downright deceptive. Most weeks were filled with literally nothing to do - and those times that I was assigned something, it was always paperwork, [b]completely[/b] irrelevant to an undergraduate and graduate engineering degree. I really, really, REALLY cannot stress enough how little I was given, and how irrelevant my job responsibilities were to my skillset. I did not see a single soul work the job description described to me, and feel very strongly that it did not (and currently does not) exist.
[quote]
Wow, I am amazed that this program exists. I received my award letter, filled out my forms and waited for the money. Incredibly, on the third Friday in August I received a direct deposit of $4,950 into my bank account ($2,750 monthly stipend, $1,200 for insurance and $1,000 for books). Each and every third Friday of the month, I receive another $2,750. What have I had to do? At the end of the semester I had to send them an official transcript, that's it - a $12 transcript.. I haven't done any of the internships yet and have not had to go through the hiring process, but that will happen soon enough. Every time I have a question, I send an email to the point of contact and my questions are answered promptly. The freedom and reduction in the pressure of providing for may family has been tremendous.
[/quote]
[quote]
I find humor in the posts that say "don't bother with SMART, it is a waste of time and effort, just go directly to the private market". I will pocket $35,200 per year (maybe even more once I complete the MS degree en route to the PhD) plus tuition and fees, for the next three years,. I have a paid internship that will give me a preview of my job for the next two summers. I also have the possibility of a job after graduation (if it doesn't work out, oh-well).
[/quote]
Back when I found out that SMART existed, I was amazed, excited even. Work hard in school, get recruited along with others that are described as the "best and the brightest," provided a stipend, and a job after graduation. Everything was supposed to be taken care of - I thought of it as an opportunity to rid myself of all of the stresses outside of my studies themselves. It was great and life couldn't be better.
However, in light of my experience (and the many others that are described on this forum), I would caution all applicants to think outside of the immediate financial rewards of this program. In particular, I'd really try to find out from other scholars (and even other employees) at the SF what exactly they do day-to-day. If it's what you were dreaming of, great! However, if it's not, think long and hard about accepting. If for example R&D is your dream job, be damn sure they are researching, designing, prototyping, and doing the legwork that you expect yourself to be doing. Don't settle for the paper-pusher that hands out contracts to the R&D contractors, even if you can reason to yourself that you can do it for the term of your scholarship service commitment. While that may be true, come finding-another-employment-opportunity time, you will find it will be quite difficult to explain to your prospective employers during interviews how you're going to bring anything to the table. They're hiring you on the expectation that you have experience, you know what youre doing. If you're rusty on skills, and have nothing on your resume other than paperpusher, you're not giving them a good reason to hire you over the recent graduate or another person who is fresh on those skills. By the way, most research / development / design groups will give you a technical interview. It's hard to BS your way out of those....
My point being - do not get caught in that trap! The financial rewards of SMART may be great initially, but you may pay dearly for it career wise. Consider carefully, and accept only after you are nothing less than 100% sure that you'll be satisfied.